Which of the following best describes the evaluation of synchronization during routines?

The evaluation of synchronization during routines is best described as being assessed through group performances. This emphasizes the importance of how well team members work together in a coordinated manner. In ensemble routines, synchronization is a critical factor because it showcases unity and cohesive execution among performers. Judges typically look for how seamlessly group members align their movements with each other, which contributes to the overall aesthetic and effectiveness of the performance.

In contrast, the other options present conditions that do not fully capture the essence of synchronization evaluation. Synchronization is not irrelevant to overall scoring; rather, it plays a vital role in the overall performance assessment. Focusing solely on solo movements disregards the collective aspect of group routines where synchronization is assessed. Additionally, considering synchronization only in the context of dance partners limits the evaluation to duet performances, while group routines could involve more complex forms of coordination among multiple participants.